Steven Seagal Should Not Be Keeping Sex Slaves by Adrian Chen Because of that, he used to have a whole hell of a lot of money, which was way more than the amount of money he currently has, which is no money.” “Scott Storch, a meerkat wearing sunglasses, once produced mega-hits for artists like Beyoncé, Chris Brown and 50 Cent. Superstar Producer Scott Storch, Who Once Had $70 Million, Now Has $100 by Jordan Sargent Maybe that 280,000 square-foot fantasyland office was a bit much?” “Ecko, the hip hop clothing line that morphed over a decade from underground to JC Penney chic, is in danger of going bankrupt. Marc Ecko Regrets Spending Millions on Doorknobs, Baseballs, Basketball Courts by Hamilton Nolan Here is a sample below-presented without comment-to give you a sense of how Gawker feels about other people who find themselves in trouble. How do I know? Their own coverage from over the years. If anyone else was in their shoes, Gawker writers would be fighting each other for the pageviews in dancing on their grave. Trotter, is purporting to cover his own company’s bankruptcy objectively and doing so with a kind of sensitivity and sobriety never before seen on the site. Which is what makes it particularly rich that in the midst of a $140M judgement against the company and declaring bankruptcy last week, Gawker is insisting publicly that they will be proven right on appeal and that their bankruptcy and sale will change nothing. No one is ever vindicated and a financial restructuring never works out. No one has reported more credulously on frivolous lawsuits than Gawker and no one has been more ignorant of the complexities of the finances of big corporations or celebrities (why learn the facts when the facts would just make a story less sensational?) To the Gawker-writers of the world, every defendant is guilty and every bankruptcy is because the person is out-on-the-streets broke. No one has been more guilty of this over the years than Gawker.
0 kommentar(er)
